How can founders prioritize features when everything feels important?

How can founders prioritize features when everything feels important?

Introduction

Every founder faces this problem: the roadmap is crowded, investors want one thing, customers demand another, and your team is already stretched. It feels like every feature is a priority.

The truth is, treating everything as urgent is the fastest way to stall momentum. Without clear prioritization, you risk burning time and resources without moving closer to traction.

Why do founders get stuck?

In early stages, founders often:

  • Try to satisfy every request, leading to bloated roadmaps

  • Struggle to say no to investors or early customers

  • Build features that add complexity without adding value

The result is an MVP that grows into a “minimum everything product” instead of a focused experiment.

What is the core value to prove first?

Eric Ries in The Lean Startup emphasizes testing the riskiest assumption.

  • If a feature does not validate your core value, it can wait.

  • Airbnb proved demand with simple air mattresses. Payments, ratings, and maps came later.

  • Dropbox validated interest with a short demo video that attracted 70,000 signups.

How can founders rank features quickly?

The MoSCoW method (Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, Won’t-have) is simple and effective.

  • Must-have: critical for validation now

  • Should-have: useful but not critical

  • Could-have: backlog items

  • Won’t-have: explicitly excluded

This forces trade-offs and provides clarity on the next 30 days.

Which users matter most?

Geoffrey Moore in Crossing the Chasm highlights that early adopters matter more than the general market.

  • If a feature directly helps your first users adopt and stick, prioritize it.

  • If it is only relevant for future customers, defer it.

Instagram grew by leaning into filters that early users loved, not by building everything at once.

How do you connect features to measurable goals?

Before building, ask:

  • Will this feature increase signups?

  • Will it reduce churn this month?

  • Will it prove demand to investors?

If the impact is unclear, the feature likely does not belong on the near-term roadmap.

Founder Checklist

  • Does this validate my riskiest assumption?

  • Will my first 10 users care deeply about it?

  • Is it a must-have or just a nice-to-have?

  • Can I tie it to a measurable outcome this month?

  • Do I have the bandwidth to build it without slowing progress?

Closing Thought

A startup’s strength comes from focus, not volume. The best founders say no more often than yes. By aligning features with validation, you move faster, spend less, and learn more.

FAQs

How much does this cost?
Building even one unnecessary feature can cost $5,000–$20,000 in wasted development hours. Prioritization avoids that expense.

How fast can this be done?
Feature ranking with MoSCoW can be completed in a single 90-minute session. That clarity saves weeks of confusion.

Do I need a CTO?
Not always. Many startups use a fractional CTO or advisor for 10–20 hours a month. That costs far less than hiring a full-time CTO at $200k+ per year.

➡️ Ready to put these questions into action? Learn how we guide founders from idea to MVP on our MVP Services page.

Related Posts