How can founders prioritize features when everything feels important?

Introduction

Every founder faces this problem: the roadmap is crowded, investors want one thing, customers demand another, and your team is already stretched. It feels like every feature is a priority.

The truth is, treating everything as urgent is the fastest way to stall momentum. Without clear prioritization, you risk burning time and resources without moving closer to traction.

---

Why do founders get stuck?

In early stages, founders often:

• Try to satisfy every request, leading to bloated roadmaps

• Struggle to say no to investors or early customers

• Build features that add complexity without adding value

The result is an MVP that grows into a “minimum everything product” instead of a focused experiment.

---

What is the core value to prove first?

Eric Ries in The Lean Startup emphasizes testing the riskiest assumption.

• If a feature does not validate your core value, it can wait.

• Airbnb proved demand with simple air mattresses. Payments, ratings, and maps came later.

• Dropbox validated interest with a short demo video that attracted 70,000 signups.

---

How can founders rank features quickly?

The MoSCoW method (Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, Won’t-have) is simple and effective.

• Must-have: critical for validation now

• Should-have: useful but not critical

• Could-have: backlog items

• Won’t-have: explicitly excluded

This forces trade-offs and provides clarity on the next 30 days.

---

Which users matter most?

Geoffrey Moore in Crossing the Chasm highlights that early adopters matter more than the general market.

• If a feature directly helps your first users adopt and stick, prioritize it.

• If it is only relevant for future customers, defer it.

Instagram grew by leaning into filters that early users loved, not by building everything at once.

---

How do you connect features to measurable goals?

Before building, ask:

• Will this feature increase signups?

• Will it reduce churn this month?

• Will it prove demand to investors?

If the impact is unclear, the feature likely does not belong on the near-term roadmap.

---

Founder Checklist

• Does this validate my riskiest assumption?

• Will my first 10 users care deeply about it?

• Is it a must-have or just a nice-to-have?

• Can I tie it to a measurable outcome this month?

• Do I have the bandwidth to build it without slowing progress?

---

Closing Thought

A startup’s strength comes from focus, not volume. The best founders say no more often than yes. By aligning features with validation, you move faster, spend less, and learn more.

---

FAQs

How much does this cost?
Building even one unnecessary feature can cost $5,000–$20,000 in wasted development hours. Prioritization avoids that expense.

How fast can this be done?
Feature ranking with MoSCoW can be completed in a single 90-minute session. That clarity saves weeks of confusion.

Do I need a CTO?
Not always. Many startups use a fractional CTO or advisor for 10–20 hours a month. That costs far less than hiring a full-time CTO at $200k+ per year.

➡️ Ready to put these questions into action? Learn how we guide founders from idea to MVP on our MVP Services page.